Will a combination of pragmatic optimism and a “fear of being left behind” in global CEOs drive M&A activity in 2025?

Third, 72% of all respondents had indicated in the survey that they were “proactively assessing their portfolio in line with their core strategy.” EY analysts have read this to indicate “positive CEO confidence combined with a realistic understanding of the risks and rewards stemming from external disruptive forces” and expect a boost in M&A activity for the year ahead. Also:

  • Globally, 24% of all respondents indicated that the key challenge with their portfolio reviews was the lack of effective metrics to measure how business contributed to strategy and total shareholder returns. Other key challenges cited were the ability to compare portfolio businesses against industry performance benchmarks (global 23%); and the disconnect between portfolio review and necessary M&A actions (global 18%).
  • 98% of global respondents had indicated they were planning some form of transaction over the next 12 months. Some 37% of all respondents who indicated the intention to do so also indicated they were planning an M&A in the next year, while 44% globally had indicated they were planning to chase divestments or IPOs; while 47% had cited plans to actively pursue a strategic partnership with a third party.
  • 93% of all respondents11 had cited pausing or canceling a transaction in the past 12 months. The top reasons for doing so were geopolitical uncertainty (global 18%), valuation gap (global 15%) and regulatory uncertainty (global 16%)12.
  • 33% of all respondents13 saw supply chain pressures as major disruptive forces, and 29%14 had indicated climate change and environmental issues as such disruptions.
  • The variances among respondents from Singapore against their global peers were interpreted by EY analysts were as follows:
  • They face greater pressure from global geopolitical challenges given their business exposure to jurisdictions around the world.
  • Evolving regulations were a top concern as Singapore is a trade-reliant economy, and any perceived tightening of regulations, especially those affecting cross-border trades, can have a material impact on Singapore enterprises.
  • Singapore respondents should perform scenario planning and supply chain risk management to address the risks.
  • Changing customer needs were also concerning for the respondents, as their customers today are constantly bombarded with information and choice, and so respondents’ firms need to continually innovate and differentiate themselves to remain appealing.